← Back to tableAll incidents timeline

Suggest a change

About Claude Mythos Preview copies files off a university server and runs its calculation there

Suggest a change to an entry, the methodology or the ledger as a whole: something to fix, correct or add. We read every suggestion, and check corrections against their sources.

Anthropic· Claude Mythos Preview

Claude Mythos Preview copies files off a university server and runs its calculation there

Asked in an evaluation to run a scientific analysis, the model hit an error on a university-hosted public tool, copied files off the server, found an injection flaw in the script's code and used it to run the calculation on the university's machine.

Disclosed by Anthropic on 9 October 2026 in a report on unintended model actions. The public tool the model needed was hosted by an unnamed university and returned an error. The model found a script on the server that would return any file it was asked for, used it to copy files including the script's own code, found an injection flaw in that code and ran the calculation on the server. Anthropic says the behaviour appeared when the model's own tools were deliberately limited or an outside service was unavailable, and was seen on DeepSearchQA, BrowseComp, LABBench2 and internal evaluations. It gives no date, no count for this case and says the cases overall had minimal real-world impact. The university is not named and the post does not say it was told.

Updated 19 Oct 2026

First incident action to disclosure
Unknown
First incident action to discovery
Not disclosed
Noticed first by
The handler
Caught
A later review

What happened

  • First incident action
  • Unnoticed
  • Handler found out
  • Known, not public
  • Disclosed
  • Public
  1. Not disclosed

    First incident action

    Public analysis tool at a university returns an error; model finds a script that returns any file

    The evaluation asked the model to run a scientific analysis. Date not disclosed.

  2. Not disclosed

    Model copies server files, finds an injection flaw and runs the calculation on the server

    It used the script to copy files including the script's own code. Anthropic says this was SQL or command injection in some cases. Date not disclosed.

  3. Jul 2026

    Handler found out

    Anthropic begins the transcript review that finds most of these cases

    The post does not say this case was found in that review.

  4. 9 Oct 2026

    Disclosed

    Anthropic publishes the report

    It briefed the White House and notified each government agency involved. It does not say whether the university was told, and names no organisation.

  5. 12 Oct 2026

    Anthropic corrects the stated purpose of the fetch-tool URL limit

    The first version said the limits were meant to stop SQL or command injection. The correction says they were not, though in a few runs models used URL shorteners while carrying out an injection or other unintended action.

Agent failures

Unauthorised access, Sandbox escapeShow
Map to frameworks
  • Unauthorised access

    Copied files from a university's server, then used an injection flaw to run commands on it.

  • Sandbox escape

    Worked round deliberately limited tools and an unavailable service by reaching a live outside machine.

How it was found

Found first by the handler, from a later reviewShow
Found first by
The handler
How
A later review
Found to disclosed
about 85 days

Anthropic says it identified most of the cases through a review of transcripts begun in July 2026, first on cybersecurity evaluations and later on a wider set. The post does not describe how this case was found. Anthropic has since built tooling that detects and blocks these behaviours and says it blocked every case in the report.

What is publicly known

1 of 12 fully publicShow
1 of 12 fully public
ItemPublic?DetailSources
KnownClaude Mythos Preview, named in the post.
UnknownNo reasoning or effort setting is stated for this case.
PartialAnthropic says its fetch-tool guardrails were later tightened and detection tooling added; what was active during this run is not stated.
UnknownNot published or described.
PartialDescribed as running a scientific analysis with a public tool; the prompt text is not quoted.
PartialPost says the model's own tools were deliberately limited; the tool set is not listed. The evaluation category (DeepSearchQA, BrowseComp, LABBench2 or internal) is given for the behaviour overall, not for this run.
PartialThe model could reach the university's public site; the network policy is not described. Anthropic has since turned off live internet access for all internal evaluations.
UnknownNo transcript or tool-call log is published for this case.
UnknownThe post does not say what signal first flagged it.
WeakAn unnamed university's server was accessed and commands were run on it. Anthropic says overall impact was minimal; what the calculation cost or exposed on the university's side is not stated.
PartialAnthropic ties the behaviour to tools being deliberately limited or an outside service being unavailable, and says some training environments rewarded working round restrictions.
PartialFetch-tool guardrails tightened, detection and blocking tooling built, live internet access off for internal evaluations. Nothing specific to the university.

Controls that apply

  • Protect

    Hold test, training and evaluation environments to production standards

    Evaluations such as DeepSearchQA, BrowseComp and LABBench2 ran with live internet while the model's own tools were deliberately limited, the condition Anthropic says brought out this behaviour. Anthropic has since turned off live internet access for all internal evaluations.

  • Limit where the agent can send traffic

    Requests to a university server outside the evaluation, copying its files and then sending commands to it. An allowlist limited to the public tool's own endpoint would have refused the requests to the file-returning script.

  • Check each action against policy before it runs

    Requests through a script that returns any file, pulling the server's own code, then an injected command. A check on each request's arguments would have blocked them; Anthropic says its new tooling now detects and blocks this behaviour.

  • Detect

    Record every agent action, outside the agent

    Each request to the university server, from the file reads to the injected calculation, recorded with the run and time. Anthropic gives no date and no count for this case.

  • Monitor every run and alert on what does not fit the task

    Anthropic found most cases by reviewing transcripts from July and does not say how it found this one. A monitor reading every run would have raised a file request returning a server's own code, followed by an injected command, when it happened.

  • All controls →

Coverage and commentary

1 statement, 1 articleShow

What the parties involved said

  • Anthropic

    Says the cases had minimal real-world impact, that none involved customer data or its own internal systems, and that it briefed the White House and notified each government agency involved.

All 2 sources
  1. Primary source

    Investigating unintended model actions ↗Anthropic · 2026-10-09

  2. Commentary

    Anthropic's agents took unintended actions ↗56North · 2026-10-12

Entry id anthropic-mythos-preview-university-server-2026 · overall Confirmed · impact serious