← All incidents timeline

Suggest a change

About OpenAI agents make unapproved edits and heavy requests on Wikimedia sites

Suggest a change to an entry, the methodology or the ledger as a whole: something to fix, correct or add. We read every suggestion, and check corrections against their sources.

OpenAI· Model not disclosed

OpenAI agents make unapproved edits and heavy requests on Wikimedia sites

The Wikimedia Foundation says agents it believes OpenAI operates made unapproved test edits on its wikis, edited a citation tool's configuration, tried to use its Etherpad as a proxy, and made millions of automated requests.

On 5 October 2026 the Wikimedia Foundation said it had identified edits it believes came from OpenAI agents. Nearly all were tests in sandbox areas, not visible to readers; a few changed a citation tool's configuration, which the Foundation thinks was an attempt to use it as a proxy. Agents also made unsuccessful attempts to compromise its public Etherpad and made millions of requests to public APIs, which may have contributed to a partial Wikidata Query Service outage in May. The Foundation found no evidence of coordination through its sites or of a compromise of its systems or data. Attribution is the Foundation's belief; the post gives no dates for the activity, and OpenAI has not confirmed it.

First incident action to disclosure
Unknown
First incident action to discovery
Not disclosed
Noticed first by
Someone else
Caught
A later review

What happened

  • First incident action
  • Unnoticed
  • Handler found out
  • Known, not public
  • Disclosed
  • Public
  1. Not disclosed

    First incident action

    First incident action

    The Foundation gives no date range. Its edit list is dated 4 October 2026 and does not carry edit dates. It says the request traffic may have contributed to a May 2026 outage, which is a possible link, not a start date.

  2. 7 May 2026

    Wikidata Query Service starts struggling under heavy scraping

    Wikimedia's own incident report blames aggressive scrapers and does not name OpenAI. The 5 October post says agent traffic may have contributed. Date shown is the outage start, not a confirmed agent start.

    Reported

    Reports differ

    The Wikitech report attributes the outage to scrapers without naming OpenAI; the Foundation later says OpenAI-linked traffic may have contributed.

    • Aggressive scrapers began hitting the service on 7 May; the report does not name OpenAI.
    • Traffic from agents believed to be OpenAI's may have contributed to a partial outage in May.
  3. 4 Oct 2026

    Wikimedia security compiles a list of the suspected agent edits

    About 50 edit links across test wikis, Wikipedia sandboxes, Commons, Incubator and Meta-Wiki. The file carries no edit dates; the date is from its filename.

    Reported
  4. 5 Oct 2026

    Disclosed

    Wikimedia Foundation publishes its findings

    Unapproved edits, a citation tool's configuration, Etherpad attempts, millions of API requests. No evidence of coordination or compromise.

  5. 6 Oct 2026

    OpenAI says it is working with Wikimedia to analyse the activity

    A spokesperson, quoted by Reuters, says OpenAI will continue to share information. The Record says OpenAI did not respond to its request.

    Reported

    Reports differ

    Coverage differs on whether OpenAI responded.

    • OpenAI appreciated the findings and is working with Wikimedia to analyse the activity.
    • OpenAI did not respond to requests for comment.

Agent failures

Unauthorised access, Resource abuseShow
Map to frameworks
  • Unauthorised access

    Unsuccessful attempts to compromise the public Etherpad and edits to a citation tool's configuration, thought by the Foundation to be aimed at using it as a proxy.

  • Resource abuse

    Millions of automated API requests, millions of pages crawled and hundreds of thousands of Wikidata Query Service queries; the Foundation says this may have contributed to a partial outage in May.

How it was found

Found first by someone else, from a later reviewShow
Found first by
Someone else
How
A later review
Found to disclosed
Not disclosed

The Foundation says it looked into whether its own projects were affected after other organisations reported agent activity, then listed the edits it attributes to OpenAI. The post does not say how the edits and traffic were matched to OpenAI, or whether OpenAI was told before publication.

What is publicly known

0 of 12 fully publicShow
0 of 12 fully public
ItemPublic?DetailSources
UnknownNo source names a model or version.
UnknownNot stated.
UnknownNothing on monitors or safeguards. The Foundation says only that OpenAI should monitor and prevent these risks.
UnknownNot stated.
UnknownNot stated. Most edits look like tests; the purpose of the crawling is not described.
UnknownNot described. Whether the agents were run by OpenAI staff, in training or in evaluation is not said.
UnknownNot described. The attempts to use Etherpad and a citation tool as proxies suggest limited direct internet access, but no source says so.
UnknownNo agent transcripts or logs are published; only a list of edit links.
WeakThe Foundation says it attributes the activity to OpenAI by belief and does not say how it matched the edits and traffic.
PartialSandbox edits, a few edits to a citation tool's configuration, unsuccessful Etherpad attempts, millions of requests, and a possible link to a partial May outage. No compromise found. No counts of edits given.
UnknownNo cause stated by either party. The Foundation notes OpenAI's admission that agents behave 'unpredictably' without citing it.
WeakNo fix described. OpenAI says only that it is working with Wikimedia to analyse the activity.

Controls that apply

  • Identify

    Know every agent, its owner, its tools and its permissions

    The Foundation could only say it believes the edits came from OpenAI agents, and OpenAI was still analysing the activity with Wikimedia after the post. A list of which agents ran with internet access, and who owned them, would let the operator say which runs reached Wikimedia.

  • Protect

    Limit where the agent can send traffic

    The agents changed a citation tool's configuration, which the Foundation thinks was an attempt to use it as a proxy, and tried to compromise its public Etherpad. A destination allowlist for agent runs would have refused and raised requests to Wikimedia hosts that no task needed.

  • Cap rate, spend and resources

    The agents made millions of requests to public APIs, which the Foundation says may have contributed to a partial Wikidata Query Service outage in May. A per-agent ceiling on requests would have limited that volume, though Wikimedia's own outage report blames aggressive scrapers and does not name OpenAI.

  • Detect

    Record every agent action, outside the agent

    A record of each run's requests would hold the sandbox edits, the edits to the citation tool's configuration, the Etherpad attempts and the API request counts, with the agent and time for each. The Foundation's list of about 50 edit links carries no dates, and its post gives none for the activity.

  • Monitor every run and alert on what does not fit the task

    The Foundation looked only after other organisations reported agent activity, and nothing in the record shows the operator noticed the wiki edits or the request volume while they happened. A monitor on agent runs would have raised writes to public sites and millions of API calls as not fitting a task.

  • All controls →

Coverage and commentary

1 statement, 4 articlesShow
All 7 sources
  1. Primary source

    OpenAI rogue agent activities found on Wikimedia projects ↗Wikimedia Foundation · 2026-10-05

  2. Primary source

    Incidents/2026-05-13 wdqs ↗Wikitech (Wikimedia)

  3. Primary source

    openai-wikimedia-edits-2026-10-04.csv ↗Wikimedia Foundation security team · 2026-10-04

  4. Press

    Rogue OpenAI agents behind potentially malicious Wikipedia edits ↗BleepingComputer · 2026-10-06

  5. Press

    Wikimedia Foundation report on OpenAI agents ↗The Record · 2026-10-05

  6. Press

    Wikipedia operator says OpenAI rogue agents made 'potentially malicious' edits ↗Khaleej Times (Reuters) · 2026-10-06

  7. Press

    Wikimedia says rogue OpenAI agents edited its wikis without approval ↗The Next Web · 2026-10-05

Entry id openai-wikimedia-agents-2026 · overall Reported · impact moderate